Quick question; could someone point me to the rules (if there are any) around smoking on community property? For example roads and the fields? If there aren't any guidelines perhaps that is something to consider (at least in summer) given how dry the summers are getting? Thanks!
The survey asked respondents to identify their usage (e.g., full-time resident, rental, etc.), however this data does NOT appear in the reported results published on the website. This information is critical to interpreting the findings accurately.
Does anyone wonder if this data was excluded from the analysis, and if so, on what basis? Why was this information not included in the posted results?
I have emailed the board for clarification and will post their response once I receive it.
I want to follow up on the recent board decision regarding additional legal counsel so the community has a clear picture of what happened.
The meeting agenda listed “Discussion of Budget Neutral Additional Legal Representation.” I asked in advance for more detail since nothing was included in the board packet and was told it was just a discussion item.
At the meeting, the board then made and approved a motion to retain a second attorney. The stated purpose—shared during the meeting—was to assist with updating our bylaws and covenants in preparation for WUCIOA implementation.
While that may be a valid objective, the concern is with how this was handled:
The agenda did not indicate that a decision would be made
No supporting information was provided to members in advance
I submitted a records request to better understand the Board’s decision to bring on additional legal counsel for updating our governing documents. Instead of receiving documents, I received explanatory responses. I’m sharing both here so the community has more context:
Engagement agreement/contract for additional legal counsel
Board response: No agreement has been executed. Reviewing and will prepare for approval.
Written scope of work for that engagement
Board response: Assistance in updating governing documents under the Washington Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act (WUCIOA) in coordination with Spark Management and current attorneys. Additional counsel may also provide general legal advice.
Board resolution approving the engagement
Board response: See May’s Board of Directors meeting minutes once published.
Documents describing billing structure or cost allocation
Board response: No agreement has been entered into. “Budget neutral” refers to staying within the 2026 budget for WUCIOA updates.
The Board believes this approach will save money and help meet the 2028 deadline.
Based on these responses, it appears that no formal engagement agreement, defined scope of work, or billing structure has been finalized yet. At the same time, the Board has indicated that additional counsel has been approved or is being used in some capacity. That raises a basic governance question about whether key details—scope, cost, and terms—should be clearly established before moving forward.
So far, no figures have been shared showing how this approach will reduce costs or "budget neutral" . We already know the Board has agreed to pay $3,600 to Spark Management for bylaw and rules review and guidance, and attorney fees would be in addition to that, plus the costof the covenants. For comparison, the past Board obtained a quote of $10,000 from a law firm to fully draft updated bylaws and covenants.
To be clear, updating our documents for WUCIOA compliance is important. The goal should be to ensure the process is transparent, well-defined, and financially sound for the community. If additional documentation (draft agreements, proposals, estimates, or meeting materials) exists, it would be helpful for those to be shared so homeowners can better understand the plan and the expected costs.
After discussing how the pool is "nowhere near capacity", they also approved the purchase of additional pool chairs.
I guess they know that opening the pool to renters will lead to a shortage of seating. ☹️
My family and I are incredibly grateful for spending time in Snowline. We are all so lucky to have the opportunity to live, recreate, and spend time here. I, for one, am excited that families coming to visit Snowline will be able to use the pool and other amenities. My least favorite memory in Snowline over the last five years was watching a dad through the pool’s fence explain to his young daughter why she couldn't go swimming but other kids could. I am thankful that this community is turning back towards a welcoming environment.
I think a stage 3 burn ban does address this, as far as I know the county has never gone to a stage 3. I would suggest we leave it to the experts.